Plasmids 101: Introduction to FRET

Posted by Jason Niehaus on Jun 27, 2017 9:03:20 AM


Imagine being able to determine whether two proteins are within 10 nanometers of each other, or measure the tension in the helical structure of spider silk, or the activity of a protein in a synapse. What kinds of tools enable us to measure these properties, and what fascinating experiments could push these tools even further? All of these things can be done using FRET! Read on to find out more about this amazing imaging technique.

Download the Fluorescent Proteins 101 eBook

What is this FRET You Speak of?

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) was originally described by Theodor Förster in 1948 as a variation of the more commonly observed light emission by fluorescence. The widespread use of FRET with fluorescent molecules, including fluorescent proteins, has led to the alternative acronym Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. Unlike the typical excitation and emission of an excited fluorophore, FRET involves a non-radiative transfer of energy (i.e. no emitted photons) from the excited donor fluorophore to the acceptor fluorophore. The typical steps in FRET are:

1. Donor fluorophore excitation by absorption of a photon

2. Energy transfer from the excited donor directly to the acceptor fluorophore--think of it as a virtual photon

3. Relaxation of the acceptor fluorophore back to its ground state by emission of a photon with wavelength specific to the acceptor

FRET Spectral Overlap-01.pngIn order for FRET to occur several constraints must be met. The donor and acceptor fluorophores must be compatible, such that the emission spectrum of the donor fluorophore overlaps with the excitation spectrum of the acceptor fluorophore. Otherwise the energy transferred from the donor will not be able to excite the acceptor. In addition to sufficient spectral overlap, the fluorophores must be located within 1-10nm of each other and be oriented appropriately for energy transfer via dipole-dipole interaction.

The efficiency of FRET can be measured for a given donor-acceptor pair and a change in FRET efficiency correlates with a change in the distance and/or orientation of the FRET pair. Since many biological processes occur within the typical FRET range, FRET efficiency is used to infer an interaction between the fluorophores and serves as a small-scale ruler to measure distances that are too miniscule for conventional light microscopy.

Don't FRET - Use These FRET Resources Instead!

As the choice of fluorophore pairs is a key consideration for a FRET experiment, the possibilities can seem overwhelming given the large assortment of fluorescent proteins available. Fortunately, several excellent reviews have collated data from various papers to make the decision easier.

1. Müller, Sara M., et al. "Quantification of Förster resonance energy transfer by monitoring sensitized emission in living plant cells." (2013). PubMed PMID: 24194740. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3810607.

2. Bajar, Bryce T., et al. "A Guide to Fluorescent Protein FRET Pairs." Sensors 16.9 (2016): 1488. PubMed PMID: 27649177. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5038762.

3. George Abraham, Bobin., et al. "Fluorescent protein based FRET pairs with improved dynamic range for fluorescence lifetime measurements." PloS one 10.8 (2015): e0134436. PubMed PMID: 26237400. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4523203.

intermolecular FRET-02.pngMany empty vectors containing these fluorescent proteins are available on our FRET Resource page and can be used to create fusions with a gene of interest. These plasmids will be most useful for constructing intermolecular FRET probes, where the donor and acceptor fluorophores are fused to two separate proteins. (In contrast, intramolecular FRET probes contain the donor and acceptor fluorophore on the same protein and are useful when a process affects the conformation of the probe. More on these biosensors later on). Experiments using intermolecular FRET probes are typically used for studying protein-protein interactions by measuring the change in FRET efficiency, from which conclusions regarding the proximity of the two proteins can be inferred.

Intermolecular FRET can be experimentally difficult to achieve, because the ratio of acceptor to donor fusions varies with transfection efficiency and any unpaired fluorescent proteins can contribute additional noise to the measurement. If the distance or orientation of the donor and acceptor proteins is not optimal, FRET may not occur or be detected even if the two proteins form a complex.

Intramolecular FRET-02.pngTo help troubleshoot your experimental setup as a potential source of error in suboptimal or undetectable FRET, well-characterized FRET reference standards can be used to validate FRET measurements and serve as a type of positive control. In the case of an unfavorable donor-acceptor orientation limiting FRET efficiency, circular permutation (Baird et al., 1999) of the fluorescent protein (i.e. rearranging the start and end positions without changing the order of the amino acids in the protein) may be able to boost FRET efficiency.

Before constructing your own FRET probe, try searching PubMed for articles describing the FRET tool that you are looking for and check our curated list of biosensors too, as another laboratory may have already created the sensor that you need. FRET biosensors designed to measure specific small biomolecules or gene activity are often intramolecular probes, as the linker sequence between the donor and acceptor is sensitive to a change in the environment which alters the FRET efficiency. Detecting certain cellular changes with an intermolecular probe is often either impractical (for biomolecules that are not proteins) or would perturb the endogenous state that you want to measure (overexpressing a gene or protein after transfection).

Future of FRET

The first genetically encoded FRET biosensor, Cameleon (Miyawaki et al., 1997), was designed to measure intracellular calcium and published in 1997. Since that time, numerous advances in probe design, fluorescent proteins and microscopy equipment have enhanced the ability of labs to answer sophisticated questions about cellular processes. Currently, FRET experiments can probe protein-protein interactions, measure the concentration or activity of small molecules, detect cellular processes and signaling cascades, quantify mechanical tension (a molecular “spring”) (Meng et al., 2008), and monitor neuronal activity (voltage sensors), to name a few.

Find Many FRET-Based Biosensors on Addgene's Biosensor Pages

Recent innovations have demonstrated the use of single-molecule FRET for imaging biomolecules in live cells (Sustarsic and Kapanidis 2015), which may lead to monitoring of these processes in live animals (Hirata and Kiyokawa 2016), and molecular tension microscopy (MTM), which could monitor physical stresses or even apply forces (Gayrard and Borghi 2016) to a selected protein. Overcoming current limitations to permit the use of multiple FRET biosensors simultaneously would further increase the amount of correlated information available from a cellular process. FRET experiments are expected to continue to contribute to our understanding of diseases and even assist in drug discovery.


References

1. Baird, Geoffrey S., et al. "Circular permutation and receptor insertion within green fluorescent proteins." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96.20 (1999): 11241-11246. PubMed PMID: 10500161. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC18018.

2. Miyawaki, Atsushi, et al. "Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin." Nature 388.6645 (1997): 882. PubMed PMID: 9278050.

3. Meng, Fanjie, et al. "A fluorescence energy transfer‐based mechanical stress sensor for specific proteins in situ." FEBS journal 275.12 (2008): 3072-3087. PubMed PMID: 18479457. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2396198.

4. Sustarsic, Marko, and Kapanidis, Achillefs N. "Taking the ruler to the jungle: Single-molecule FRET for understanding biomolecular structure and dynamics in live cells." Current opinion in structural biology 34 (2015): 52-59. PubMed PMID: 26295172.

5. Hirata, Eishu, and Kiyokawa, Etsuko. "Future Perspective of Single-Molecule FRET Biosensors and Intravital FRET Microscopy." Biophysical Journal 111.6 (2016): 1103-1111. PubMed PMID: 27475975.

6. Gayrard, Charlène, and Borghi, Nicolas. "FRET-based molecular tension microscopy." Methods 94 (2016): 33-42. PubMed PMID: 26210398.

Additional Resources on the Addgene Blog

Additional Resources on Addgene.org

Topics: Plasmids 101, Fluorescent Proteins

Blog Logo Vertical.png

Subscribe to Our Blog